Harvard Business Review February 26, 2024
Paul Baier, David DeLallo, John J. Sviokla

Summary: Many companies are struggling to derive value from GenAI because of a fundamental flaw in their approach: They think of GenAI as a traditional form of automation rather than as an assistive agent that gets smarter — and makes humans smarter — over time. The authors suggest a framework, Design for Dialogue, for reimagining their processes to mirror the back-and-forth collaboration of human dynamics to create an effective and adaptable human–AI workflow. At the heart of the framework are three primary components: task...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Employer, Technology
AI Investments Expected to Shift to Inference While Growing Faster Than Forecast
Report: OpenAI to Test Feature Connecting ChatGPT to Slack and Google Drive
Vaccines And AI
Mistral AI drops new open-source model that outperforms GPT-4o Mini with fraction of parameters
The most 'impactful' tech in 30 years? Ask Duke's health information chief

Share This Article