HMP Global January 27, 2026
Stephen D. Bittinger, JD

Key Takeaways
  • AI-Driven Medical Necessity Decisions Face Legal Uncertainty
    The use of AI tools to determine medical necessity lacks clear constitutional, statutory, or regulatory authority, potentially exposing WISeR to potential litigation and challenges over whether non-clinician systems can lawfully replace human judgment.
  • Validation, Traceability, and Evidence Standards Remain Undefined
    There is currently no established framework for validating AI decision-making, tracing how determinations are reached, or effectively challenging AI-generated evidence in appeals and enforcement actions.
  • Resource Imbalance Could Disadvantage Providers and Suppliers
    The speed and scale of AI-driven WISeR determinations may overwhelm providers unless they invest in equally sophisticated tools, potentially creating inequities between large, well-resourced organizations and smaller practices.
...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Insurance, Payer, Physician, Provider, Technology
AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective
HCA’s 2025 revenue surpassed $75B: 10 things to know
Cardiology’s outpatient shift: a recent history
‘An exciting time for osteopathic medicine’ — growth in numbers, influence, financial effect
CMS Signals MA Payment Slowdown as Provider Frustration With The Plans Continue to Mount

Share Article