Daily Signal January 10, 2020
Kevin Pham

One common claim by supporters of single-payer health care is that it would ultimately save money while providing universal health coverage for all. Having one centralized bureaucracy, they say, would eliminate complicated administrative inefficiencies that waste enormous sums of money each year.

As reported by Time, researchers behind a new study believe that by adopting Canada’s single-payer health care system, the United States would be able to save enough money to more than pay for universal coverage.

This is a bold claim, considering that the United States wastes so much money on health care administration despite, or perhaps because of, Medicare being the largest single payer of national health expenditures.

Expanding Medicare or Medicaid to cover all Americans would only...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Employer, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Medicaid, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Provider, Trends
New COVID variant makes up 25% of US cases: CDC
Breaking the silence on medical mistakes.
mRNA vaccines helped us fight COVID-19. Could cancer be next?
The Tobacco Endgame Begins
The Task Force Releases Advancing Health Equity within Value-Based Care

Share This Article