Health Affairs November 13, 2023
Holly Fernandez Lynch, Lisa Kearns, Kenneth I. Moch, Arthur L. Caplan

On the face of it, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) regulatory mandate is straightforward: Approve drugs that are safe and effective for their intended use. However, as demonstrated by several recent decisions regarding drugs to treat conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the reality is often far more complex, necessitating a balance between speedy patient access and reasonable certainty about drug benefit. When should the FDA demand more evidence, even if it will mean that a promising medicine might take longer to reach patients? And when should it exercise “regulatory flexibility” based on the risk tolerance often exhibited by those facing terrible diseases without good treatment options?

In answering these questions, it’s...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Biotechnology, FDA, Govt Agencies, Pharma, Pharma / Biotech
The telehealth background of Trump's FDA pick: 6 notes
President-elect Trump's picks for CDC, FDA, surgeon general: 31 notes
Opinion: RFK Jr. and MAHA should champion a Marshall Plan for obesity
Trump picks Johns Hopkins surgeon to head FDA: 10 things to know
Regulatory Hurdles and Ethical Concerns Beset FDA Oversight of AI/ML Devices

Share This Article