Health Affairs November 13, 2023
Holly Fernandez Lynch, Lisa Kearns, Kenneth I. Moch, Arthur L. Caplan

On the face of it, the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) regulatory mandate is straightforward: Approve drugs that are safe and effective for their intended use. However, as demonstrated by several recent decisions regarding drugs to treat conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), the reality is often far more complex, necessitating a balance between speedy patient access and reasonable certainty about drug benefit. When should the FDA demand more evidence, even if it will mean that a promising medicine might take longer to reach patients? And when should it exercise “regulatory flexibility” based on the risk tolerance often exhibited by those facing terrible diseases without good treatment options?

In answering these questions, it’s...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Biotechnology, FDA, Govt Agencies, Pharma, Pharma / Biotech
FDA issues flu vaccine recommendations: 5 respiratory updates
5 Digital Health Areas To Be Impacted By The FDA Layoffs
FDA Approves First Biosimilar to Omalizumab
Trump's Nominees to Run FDA, NIH Get Greenlighted by Senate Committee
FDA Debuts a New Communications and Compliance Tool for Device Data Integrity Concerns

Share This Article