Health IT Analytics September 13, 2016
Jennifer Bresnick

Care coordination tools aren’t a slam dunk for providers who are struggling to define their processes and find a value proposition for new health IT investments.

Healthcare providers may be having a hard time justifying the time and expense required to implement care coordination tools due to the relatively limited value proposition for investment and persistent gaps in knowledge about patient management, says a new article in the American Journal of Managed Care.

While providers generally acknowledge that care coordination and population health management can play an important role in the delivery of quality care, many organizations do not feel as if the value-based business case is strong enough yet to warrant a preemptive investment in data analytics technologies.

RELATED...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), ACO (Accountable Care), CMS, Employer, Health IT, Health System / Hospital, Healthcare System, HIM (Health Inf Mgmt), MACRA, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Physician, Population Health Mgmt, Primary care, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt), Retail care, Self-insured, Value Based
New Medicaid Guidance Helps States Ensure Kids Get Needed Care
Health system CIOs' strategic responsibilities continue to evolve
What Tenet, CHS executives expect from Trump's FTC
How AI is Transforming the Acute Patient Journey
HL Shorts: Addressing SDOH to Improve Patient Care

Share This Article