Medical Economics September 20, 2024
Richard Payerchin

Commonwealth Fund experts consider value-based care, but it’s likely not a magic bullet to reduce administrative costs or friction.

As the United States trails in rankings of health care systems of developed nations, value-based care could improve patient outcomes, but might not smooth out administrative efficiency.

This week, The Commonwealth Fund published its latest “Mirror, Mirror 2024: A Portrait of the Failing U.S. Health System.” The report shows the U.S. health care is falling behind – in some instances, way behind – nine other developed nations, according to 70 performance measures of access to care, care process, administrative efficiency, equity and health outcomes.

So, how does value-based care fit into the health care quality equation?

The American Journal of Managed...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Payment Models, Provider, Survey / Study, Trends, Value Based
Podcast: Medicare Shared Savings Program Mints $2B Win for Value-Based Care w/ Frank McStay
AHA, others urge Congress to act on alternative payment models, avoid physician payment cut
Value-Based Care Is a Four Layer Cake — Why Do We Only Focus on The Icing?
Cityblock Health Validates Value-Based Care Arrangement with 11.5% Payer Expense Reduction
Podcast: What Direction Will Alternative Payment Models Head Over the Next Four Years? 11/21/24

Share This Article