Home Health Care News December 20, 2022
Andrew Donlan

Data examinations are beginning to shed greater insight on just how much better value-based payment models are for quality of care.

When comparing two-sided risk models in Medicare Advantage (MA) versus fee-for-service Medicare programs, the former performed better in all eight quality-of-care metrics. That is at least according to a new study published this month in JAMA.

The metrics examined included odds of inpatient admission; inpatient admission through the emergency department (ED); ED visits; avoidable ED visits; 30-day readmission; admission for stroke or myocardial infarction; and hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation.

The study was led by authors affiliated with UnitedHealth Group’s (NYSE: UNH) Optum and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. The starkest...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Insurance, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Payment Models, Provider, Survey / Study, Trends, Value Based
'Like peering through fog without a compass': Value-based care's future in orthopedics
Innovation — but at what price? CMMI Under the Microscope
How Tufts CEO aims to overcome 'fragmented', 'high-cost' healthcare market
Patient Engagement Is Essential for Achieving the Goals of Value-Based Care
CMMI’s Innovations in Behavioral Health: Promoting Physical and Mental Well-being

Share This Article