Home Health Care News December 20, 2022
Andrew Donlan

Data examinations are beginning to shed greater insight on just how much better value-based payment models are for quality of care.

When comparing two-sided risk models in Medicare Advantage (MA) versus fee-for-service Medicare programs, the former performed better in all eight quality-of-care metrics. That is at least according to a new study published this month in JAMA.

The metrics examined included odds of inpatient admission; inpatient admission through the emergency department (ED); ED visits; avoidable ED visits; 30-day readmission; admission for stroke or myocardial infarction; and hospitalization for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma exacerbation.

The study was led by authors affiliated with UnitedHealth Group’s (NYSE: UNH) Optum and the Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health. The starkest...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Insurance, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Payment Models, Provider, Survey / Study, Trends, Value Based
How Upfront, Predictable Payments Can Improve Primary Care
American Health Partners CEO Reveals ‘Secret Sauce’ for Value-Based Care in Skilled Nursing
Pre-approval Plan Proposed for Medicare Advantage Insurers
Senators hear administrative burdens and potential solutions that could help physicians, patients
Exploring the role of AI in healthcare risk stratification

Share This Article