Forbes March 25, 2025
Francesca Dominici, PhD

Right after Trump was elected president of the United States in 2016, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt pledged to reexamine landmark environmental policies and repeal regulations. In their view, excessive regulations harm the US industry, and thus, reducing regulations would be suitable for businesses. On June 12, 2018, with my colleague David Cutler, a health economist at Harvard, we published a short article where we quantified and summarised the possible adverse health impacts of repealing environmental regulations. You can read the details here. For example, the EPA’s 2017 Regulatory Impact Analysis estimated that repealing the Clean Power Plants (CPP) would result in 280,000–318,000 additional short tons of SO₂ emissions and 278,000–282,000 additional short tons of NOₓ emissions...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Public Health / COVID
Trump administration pulls billions in COVID funds, and health leaders warn of lasting damage
HIMSS Changemaker: Lean into your strengths and get involved
Nutrition Funding Cuts Could Claim 369K Young Lives This Year
Cuts to CDC’s HIV Program Will Spell Disaster, HIV Advocate Says
Federal government pulls back $11.4B in COVID health funds

Share This Article