AJMC November 23, 2021
Michael E. Chernew, PhD, Jermaine Heath, AB, J. Michael McWilliams, MD, PhD

The different approaches to setting benchmarks for population-based payment models (empirical, bidding based, and administratively set) have unique advantages and challenges.

Am J Manag Care. 2022;28(7):In Press

Takeaway Points

Understanding different approaches to setting benchmarks for population-based payment models can help policy makers design accountable care organization models that reduce spending, improve quality, and promote equity. Administratively set benchmarks, which tie benchmark trajectories to external indices (as opposed to historical spending), may address problems, such as ratchet effects, that are present when using other types of benchmarks.

Although Medicare has historically relied on fee-for-service (FFS) payment, population-based payment (PBP), which provides financial incentives to plans or providers to manage total cost of care, has grown in prominence over the past...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Healthcare System, Insurance, Payment Models, Population Health Mgmt, Provider
Population Health Outcomes: The Impact of Social Determinants of Health and the Initiatives Being Implemented
Engaging Specialty Practices and Promoting Population Health
Why the RVU system makes attaining the quadruple aim laughable: a deep dive into a broken health care model
Population Health Strategies Are Vital for Tackling, Improving CKD Care
Top 9 population health platforms

Share This Article