Forbes July 22, 2024
Johanna Costigan

A severe blow to regulatory agencies’ power leveled earlier this month by the Supreme Court could have major ramifications for the United States’ nascent efforts to regulate artificial intelligence.

The Court decided in Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo to overrule landmark precedent from 1984: Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council. Per Chevron doctrine, courts were required to defer to agency interpretation.

When it comes to AI regulation, the Loper Bright decision therefore constitutes a clear but not quite decisive victory for those who believe over-regulation is the greatest danger of AI development and a loss for anyone who thinks the U.S. should pursue — not prevent — AI governance.

In the wake of the Loper Bright decision, it would be...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Govt Agencies, Regulations, Technology
Archetype AI’s Newton model learns physics from raw data—without any help from humans
Salesforce CEO Marc Beinoff slams Microsoft Copilot as ‘Clippy 2.0’
Ten Years of AI Venture Capital Deals and Exits
Where Trump & Harris Stand on Payers, AI, Drug Pricing and CMS
Harvard’s super-selective AI track

Share This Article