Forbes April 2, 2024
Joshua Cohen

The Supreme Court heard arguments last week in a case involving access restrictions to the abortion pill Mifeprex (mifepristone), which has been on the market for more than two decades. During oral arguments Justices appeared skeptical of the plaintiff’s legal standing. To win a civil case in court, a plaintiff must demonstrate direct and concrete harm by the violation or injury it claims, which the Justices seemed to dispute. Nonetheless, this challenge to the Food and Drug Administration’s regulatory authority sets a potential precedent for conducting other de facto second reviews of FDA-approved products by judges who don’t have the requisite scientific expertise.

In this particular case, though it’s unlikely to happen, a ruling in favor of the plaintiff would...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Congress / White House, FDA, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider
How socioeconomic status shapes food choices and what it means for public health
Health Care in Abundance
Why Employees Are The First Line Of Defense Against Cyber Threats
Most still trust CDC, NIH 5 years after COVID pandemic declaration: Survey
Trump administration proposes ACA program integrity rule that would decimate enrollment

Share This Article