STAT June 13, 2024
Sarah Owermohle

The Supreme Court ruled unanimously Thursday that anti-abortion doctors did not have standing to challenge the Food and Drug Administration’s regulation of the abortion pill mifepristone.

The decision in FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine reverses an appeals court order to require in-person prescribing of mifepristone, which had been available though telehealth and mail orders since 2021.

It’s a victory for the Biden administration’s efforts to protect access to reproductive health care in the wake of the court’s decision to overturn Roe v. Wade. It also affirms the FDA’s authority to regulate medicines, avoiding an outcome that the biopharmaceutical industry had warned could destabilize the drug approval process.

The justices found that the physicians who sued couldn’t be harmed...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider
FDA warns GLP-1 compounder over safety rules
GLP-1 drug approvals: A breakdown
Rethinking FDA’s Accelerated Approval Pathway: New Draft Guidances and Implications for Drug Companies
FDA approves Novo Nordisk's Ozempic to treat chronic kidney disease in those with diabetes, expanding its use
Certainty vs. speed: How do patients feel about the tradeoff for new cancer drugs?

Share This Article