STAT March 26, 2024
Sarah Owermohle

WASHINGTON — Supreme Court justices on Tuesday seemed to question physicians’ right to sue the Food and Drug Administration to reinstate restrictions around a commonly used abortion pill — a line of questioning that suggests they are unlikely to restrict access to the pill.

Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, in particular, repeatedly asked the plaintiffs, a Christian-based medical organization, for examples of when objecting physicians were forced to assist with abortion or its complications as a direct result of the FDA relaxing restrictions around mifepristone prescribing. Conservative Justice Samuel Alito, while appearing more sympathetic to the plaintiffs than others, also asked the lawyer representing the agency whether the scenario — a morally opposed doctor forced to treat a...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Physician, Provider
109 hospitals receiving new Medicare-backed residency slots
STAT+: UnitedHealth pays its own physician groups considerably more than others, driving up consumer costs and its profits
AI Robot Scanner as Good as Rheumatologists at Assessing RA
Senators urge Congress to avert Medicare physician pay cut
New study offers insights into reliable Alzheimer's diagnosis

Share This Article