Lexology July 5, 2023
K&L Gates LLP

On 16 June 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in the case of United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, holding that the federal government (Government) maintains the authority to dismiss a federal False Claims Act (FCA) action over a relator’s objection so long as the Government first intervenes in the action. The court also held that in assessing the Government’s motion to dismiss a relator’s FCA action, district courts should apply the rule governing voluntary dismissal of suits in ordinary civil litigation. This decision, in giving the Government broad discretion to dismiss a qui tam action, may affect the Government’s decision on when to intervene in an action. Additionally, the decision reinforces FCA defendants’...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Provider, Regulations
Tech Giants Push Back at a Crucial Time for the EU AI Act
The Difference Between a Law and a Regulation in Healthcare, Post-Chevron
Google, Meta execs blast Europe over strict AI regulation as Big Tech ups the ante
The Future of Regulatory Compliance Lies in AI-Powered Tech
AI Regulations: EU Withdraws AI Liability Proposal; US Seeks Comments on AI Action Plan

Share This Article