Forbes July 1, 2024
Arthur L. Kellermann

Many doctors hoped that last week’s Supreme Court decision regarding emergency care of pregnant women would provide the clarity they need to do their jobs.

It did not.

Shortly after the Court announced its decision, Ruth Marcus, a political commentator, texted this message: “Don’t be confused by the Idaho abortion case. This isn’t a win for pregnant women. It’s likely a temporary reprieve, and just for some.”

For now, pregnant Idaho women won’t need to be airlifted out of state for appropriate treatment if they come to an ER with a life-threatening complication of pregnancy such as severe bleeding, impending kidney failure, or an ectopic pregnancy.

But instead of issuing a definitive ruling, the Supreme Court returned the matter to...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Physician, Provider, States
How Providers Can Differentiate Themselves as Physician Employers Among Workforce Shortages
The future of MSK health: innovative screening approaches in orthopedic practice
AI Medical Note-Taking Apps Enjoy Healthy Wave of Investment
Some doctors increasingly using artificial intelligence to take notes during appointments
40+ cardiologists on the move in 2024

Share This Article