Forbes July 1, 2024
Arthur L. Kellermann

Many doctors hoped that last week’s Supreme Court decision regarding emergency care of pregnant women would provide the clarity they need to do their jobs.

It did not.

Shortly after the Court announced its decision, Ruth Marcus, a political commentator, texted this message: “Don’t be confused by the Idaho abortion case. This isn’t a win for pregnant women. It’s likely a temporary reprieve, and just for some.”

For now, pregnant Idaho women won’t need to be airlifted out of state for appropriate treatment if they come to an ER with a life-threatening complication of pregnancy such as severe bleeding, impending kidney failure, or an ectopic pregnancy.

But instead of issuing a definitive ruling, the Supreme Court returned the matter to...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Physician, Provider, States
Expert Insights on How Utilization Management Drives Physician Burnout
Shaping the Future of Cardiology: Key Takeaways From AHA 2024
109 hospitals receiving new Medicare-backed residency slots
STAT+: UnitedHealth pays its own physician groups considerably more than others, driving up consumer costs and its profits
AI Robot Scanner as Good as Rheumatologists at Assessing RA

Share This Article