Managed Healthcare Executive June 20, 2021
Peter Wehrwein

Results run counter to common beliefs about the effects of self-selection into voluntary value-based payment programs.

One critique of many of the value-based program launched by CMS is that they have been voluntary. That self-selection clouds results, goes the critique, because hospitals (and physician practices) that elect to participate in a program likely have attributes going into the program that will make them successful. As a result, favorable outcomes or spending reductions may be misleading as a result.

But results reported in JAMA last week bya team of researchers led by Joshua M. Liao, M.D., M.Sc., of the University of Washington poked a hole in that critique and may color the debate about value-based programs. When Liao and his fellow...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Bundled Payments, CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Payment Models, Provider, Survey / Study, Trends, Value Based
TEAM is Here, and Hospitals Are Running Out of Time to Prepare
Maternity Care Bundled Payments In The Netherlands: Changes In Health Outcomes, Spending, And Care Delivery After 5 Years
How ASC leaders view bundled payments in 2026
Providers, Payers Readying For New Medicare Bundled Payment
Dr. David Shulkin weighs in on mandatory TEAMs model

Share Article