Managed Healthcare Executive June 20, 2021
Peter Wehrwein

Results run counter to common beliefs about the effects of self-selection into voluntary value-based payment programs.

One critique of many of the value-based program launched by CMS is that they have been voluntary. That self-selection clouds results, goes the critique, because hospitals (and physician practices) that elect to participate in a program likely have attributes going into the program that will make them successful. As a result, favorable outcomes or spending reductions may be misleading as a result.

But results reported in JAMA last week bya team of researchers led by Joshua M. Liao, M.D., M.Sc., of the University of Washington poked a hole in that critique and may color the debate about value-based programs. When Liao and his fellow...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Bundled Payments, CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Payment Models, Provider, Survey / Study, Trends, Value Based
Mandatory Medicare Bundled Payment and the Future of Hospital Reimbursement
Medicare’s New Mandatory Bundled-Payment Program — Are We Ready for TEAM?
What you need to know about CMS' TEAM payment model
CMS releases participant list for mandatory Transforming Episode Accountability Model
Integrating Maternity Care Through Bundled Payments In The Netherlands: Early Results And Policy Lessons

Share This Article