Washington Examiner December 6, 2019
Sally Pipes

The public option appears to have overtaken “Medicare for all” as the Democrats’ preferred approach to healthcare reform. Nearly nine in 10 Democrats support creating a government-run health plan to compete against private insurers. Fewer than eight in 10, by contrast, are on board with “Medicare for all.”

Proponents of a public option claim it’s a win-win for consumers. They can either buy cheap government coverage or keep their private insurance if they like it.

But a new study from FTI Consulting debunks that myth. The study’s authors found that a public option would gradually drive private insurers out of the market — and thereby leave people without private coverage options.

The public option would be cheap for two reasons....

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, HHS, Insurance, Market Research, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Trends
Altman handpicked for Homeland Security's AI safety board
ONC @ 20: A Tale of Optimism and Humility
Race, Neighborhood Influence Lapses in Diabetic Retinopathy Care
Europe Strengthens Future Disease Defense
On the Need for Diversity in Medical Illustrations

Share This Article