Health Affairs September 6, 2017
Peter J. Neumann and Sachin Kamal-Bahl

Editor’s note: One of the authors of this post, Peter Neumann, will be discussing issues related to the post at a Health Affairs September 13 event, “Understanding The Value of Innovations In Medicine.”

In 1996, the U.S. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine recommended that analysts conducting cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs) should perform a reference case analysis, following a set of standard methodological practices to improve comparability and quality. They further recommended that such analyses assume a societal perspective, reflecting the perspective of a decision maker allocating resources broadly across the entire population (such as consequences of interventions that fall outside the health sector).

Since publication of the original Panel’s report, researchers have published thousands of CEAs. However, as highlighted...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACO (Accountable Care), CMS, Employer, Health System / Hospital, MACRA, Medicaid, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Physician, Population Health Mgmt, Primary care, Provider, Self-insured, Value Based
Why Are Hospitals So Expensive?
CareMax files for bankruptcy: 8 things to know
Lee Health to launch hospital-at-home program
Overweight, Obesity to Affect 64% of Americans by 2050
BCBS Massachusetts weight loss drug spend jumps 250%: 5 notes

Share This Article