NEJM December 4, 2014
Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Ph.D., Eric C. Schneider, M.D., and Eve A. Kerr, M.D., M.P.H.

The quality-measurement enterprise in U.S. health care is troubled. Physicians, hospitals, and health plans view measurement as burdensome, expensive, inaccurate, and indifferent to the complexity of care delivery. Patients and their caregivers believe that performance reporting misses what matters most to them and fails to deliver the information they need to make good decisions. In an attempt to overcome these troubles, measure developers are creating ever more measures, and payers are requiring their use in more settings and tying larger financial rewards or penalties to performance. We believe that doing more of the same is misguided: the time has come to reimagine quality measurement.
A fruitful alternative approach, in our view, would be guided by three principles: quality measurement should...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Congress / White House, Healthcare System, Payer, Provider, Uncategorized
Congressional spending plan: What’s in it for healthcare, and what isn’t
Societal Perceptions Of Health Insurers: Knights, Knaves, Or Pawns?
How 3 hospitals are reimagining behavioral crisis care
How Health Systems Can Collaborate on AI Tools
Critical access hospitals face uphill battle: 6 things to know

Share This Article