HCP Live October 18, 2024
Chelsie Derman

Key Takeaways

  • GPT-4-turbo and GPT-3.5-turbo underperformed compared to resident physicians in emergency department tasks, except for antibiotic prescriptions.
  • AI models demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity, often leading to overprescription and false positives.
  • AI’s cautious recommendations stem from training on general internet data, not tailored for emergency medical decision-making.
  • Resident physicians outperformed AI in real-world settings, highlighting AI’s current limitations in complex clinical environments.

A recent study demonstrated physicians surpass GPT-4- or GPT-3.5 turbo at making clinical recommendations in the emergency department.

ChatGPT will not be helping the decision-making for physicians any time soon, as a new study demonstrated.1

GPT-4-turbo may have performed tasks better than the earlier version, GPT-3.5-turbo, particularly in predicting the need for antibiotics for...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Physician, Provider, Survey / Study, Technology, Trends
Why 'metric madness' harms physician well-being
CMS issues Stark law guidance for physician-owned hospital
Ex-Facebook engineer is tackling clinician burnout at Freed after seeing wife's challenges
The economic power of physicians: State-by-state breakdown of output
What's going on with physician pay?

Share This Article