HCP Live October 18, 2024
Chelsie Derman

Key Takeaways

  • GPT-4-turbo and GPT-3.5-turbo underperformed compared to resident physicians in emergency department tasks, except for antibiotic prescriptions.
  • AI models demonstrated high sensitivity but low specificity, often leading to overprescription and false positives.
  • AI’s cautious recommendations stem from training on general internet data, not tailored for emergency medical decision-making.
  • Resident physicians outperformed AI in real-world settings, highlighting AI’s current limitations in complex clinical environments.

A recent study demonstrated physicians surpass GPT-4- or GPT-3.5 turbo at making clinical recommendations in the emergency department.

ChatGPT will not be helping the decision-making for physicians any time soon, as a new study demonstrated.1

GPT-4-turbo may have performed tasks better than the earlier version, GPT-3.5-turbo, particularly in predicting the need for antibiotics for...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Physician, Provider, Survey / Study, Technology, Trends
The rise of artificial intelligence in health care: The end of the front desk as we know it
AI can boost efficacy of cancer treatment, but doctors remain key
AI Poised to Help CMOs Make Inroads in the Surgical Field
The Most Overlooked Feature with AI Scribes: Coding Awareness
It’s Money That Changes Everything (Or Doesn’t) For Surgeons

Share This Article