Health Affairs September 10, 2018
Paul Cotton

“Reports of my death,” Mark Twain famously wrote, “are greatly exaggerated.”

The same is true for studies that find little or no benefit with patient-centered medical homes (PCMHs). One of the most widely cited and still recalled of these appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) in 2014. The study evaluated PCMHs in the first three years of the National Committee for Quality Assurance’s (NCQA) initial 2008 program and found “limited improvements in quality” with no hospital, emergency department, ambulatory care, or total cost reductions. The authors did not note that the practices back then had no financial incentives to improve cost or quality.

Those who wrote PCMHs off based on such premature evaluations need...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Health System / Hospital, MACRA, Patient / Consumer, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Value Based
Bundling Boomer Housing with On-site Primary Care and Wellness-Focused Living: It Just Makes Sense
SOFHA and Lumeris Partner to Enhance Value-Based Care in Tennessee and Virginia
Finalized 2025 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule advances CCM and value-based care with new advanced primary care management codes
Value-based models picked up steam in 2023: 5 numbers to know
Home-Based Care Provider HarmonyCares Thrives In ACO REACH’s First Performance Year

Share This Article