Forbes November 14, 2024
Joshua P. Cohen

In June, the Supreme Court overturned the decades-old Chevron doctrine that empowered a federal agency’s “reasonable interpretation of ambiguous federal laws.” This ruling could constrain regulatory agencies, specifically with respect to their latitude in interpreting and operationalizing laws as they see fit.

Since 1984, the Chevron doctrine has served as a framework for federal courts in deciding disputes between federal agencies and private parties over the legality of executive branch decisions and statutory regulations. For example, Congress has granted the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services considerable discretion in making policy decisions based on laws that were passed in Congress.

To illustrate, under the Inflation Reduction Act, CMS has been given the authority to select and then negotiate the prices...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Biotechnology, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicare, Pharma, Pharma / Biotech, Regulations
Self-Interpretation of Imaging by Non-Radiologists Accounts for 43.5 Percent of Medicare Imaging Claims
AHIP Medicare, Medicaid, and Duals Conference Wrap Up
House eyes Medicare payment boost for behavioral health services
Medicare Program Integrity and Efforts to Root Out Improper Payments, Fraud, Waste and Abuse
Navigating The Path To Medicare Dental Coverage

Share This Article