Health Affairs December 19, 2018
William M. Sage

When a United States District Judge in Texas ruled the Affordable Care Act unconstitutional in its entirety, commentators complained about activist courts and lamented the apparent political bent of recent appointees to the federal judiciary. There is some truth to those observations, but the fundamental failure of government that led to the Texas decision lies not in the judicial branch. The problem is Congress.

Texas v. Azar (also called Texas v. United States) makes no pronouncements about rights and – despite its posture as a suit by states against the national government – breaks no new ground regarding the limits of federal power. It is, in fact, a quotidian case of statutory interpretation masquerading as a debate over constitutional law....

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Medicaid, Patient / Consumer, Public Exchange, Regulations
Biden’s 2024 Healthcare Legacy: Was It A Failure Of More Than Messaging?
Fate of ACA Preventive Services Uncertain Before Supreme Court
After slow start, ACA enrollment takes off
CMS says record 16.6 million have signed up for Jan. 1 Marketplace coverage
Federal ACA Marketplace Enrollment Lagging

Share This Article