Health Affairs July 1, 2024
Sara Rosenbaum

When it was formally released on June 27, the Supreme Court opinion in Moyle v United States came as no surprise; Court personnel apparently inadvertently posted the decision on June 26, and it was captured by Bloomberg Law reporters before it was removed. Other than proper formatting, the actual decision is identical to the accidentally released version.

The case involved an Idaho law prohibiting abortions unless necessary to prevent a pregnant woman’s death and containing no exception for abortions necessary to prevent grave harms to the woman’s health. Before the law took effect, the United States sued Idaho under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA), which, requires Medicare-funded hospitals to provide stabilizing treatment to patients experiencing medical emergencies...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider, States
How Users Rule The Market—And Wearables Are No Exception
Patient message billing cut provider workload, but not ED visits: Mayo Clinic
Around the nation: 6M cancer deaths prevented since 1975
Pediatrician offers tips and tools on helping children use new technology safely
Do We Care Enough To End The Suffering Our Healthcare System Inflicts?

Share This Article