Health Payer Intelligence February 13, 2018
Thomas Beaton

Medicare’s current fee-for-service cost-sharing design is flawed, but modernizing the current design could create trade-offs in beneficiary costs, says GAO.

Medicare’s fee-for-service (FFS) cost-sharing design requires modernization to protect beneficiaries from catastrophic costs, but changing the current design may bring new financial concerns, a new GAO report found.

In 2015, eighty-one percent of Medicare beneficiaries receiving care in the FFS environment obtained supplemental coverage to avoid burdensome cost-sharing amounts. Beneficiaries are likely to experience financial strain as they begin to pay multiple premiums for multiple health plans.

GAO also found that a lack of cost-sharing spending caps caused a small percentage of beneficiaries to experience significant catastrophic healthcare costs.

Dig Deeper

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: GAO, Medicare, Patient / Consumer
CMS Launches New Program for Mental Health, OUD Treatment
How Medicare Negotiated Drug Prices Compare to Other Countries
Telehealth groups call for urgent action as Medicare flexibility deadline looms
Innovating Without Compromising Integration: Considerations For Medicare
How the Federal Government Could Push People Toward Medicare Advantage – And Replace Traditional Medicare

Share This Article