Medscape March 16, 2018
Kerry Dooley Young

Medicare’s fledgling Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) would incorporate the same drawbacks of earlier approaches for pegging physician reimbursement to judgments about quality of care, with the potential for large bonuses for certain clinicians eroding the incentive to join more challenging models intended to improve patient care, an influential federal panel said Thursday.

In its March report to Congress, the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC) put forward its full case for ending the fledgling MIPS program. MedPAC argues that MIPS will fail to deliver the desired improvements in quality of care because of flaws in its design, such as a lack of comprehensive measures to assess low-value care.

The panel also suggested that MIPS could inadvertently work against efforts to...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, MACRA, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt)
CMS Proposes New Ophthalmology MVP, Shake Up for Cataract Surgery MIPS | AAO 2024
CMS opens MIPS reweighting requests after Change Healthcare cyberattack: 4 notes
How CMS' MIPS program has changed
Radiologists at a clear disadvantage in Medicare’s MIPS program, new study shows
Knowing the Score: MIPS

Share This Article