Healthcare IT Today July 17, 2019
Guest Blogger

The following is a guest blog post by Jim Tate, Founder of EMR Advocate & MIPS Consulting.

Just as the Meaningful Use (MU) EHR Incentive program brought potential audits to providers, so it will be with the MIPS program. Both programs were enacted by Federal legislation, and while there are differences, they are also similarities.

The MU program contained EHR incentives for both Medicare and Medicaid defined providers. For Medicare eligible providers (EP) there was a sole CMS contractor responsible for all audits and appeals. The Medicaid audits and appeals were handled at the state level by a number of different entities. If an EP failed an audit, and it was truly a pass/fail system, the received incentive was recouped...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, MACRA, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Value Based
CMS Proposes New Ophthalmology MVP, Shake Up for Cataract Surgery MIPS | AAO 2024
CMS opens MIPS reweighting requests after Change Healthcare cyberattack: 4 notes
How CMS' MIPS program has changed
Radiologists at a clear disadvantage in Medicare’s MIPS program, new study shows
Knowing the Score: MIPS

Share This Article