RevCycle Intelligence January 3, 2020
Samantha McGrail

Policy alignment, financial risk threshold modification, and overall flexibility will help tackle concerns surrounding proposed Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law reform, medical groups say.

Tying Anti-Kickback and Stark Law reform to the level of financial risk providers assume creates more complexity and burden and could impede the transition to value-based care for physicians, advocacy organizations representing medical groups recently stated.

Comment letters from the American Medical Group Association (AGMA) and the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) to CMS and Office of the Inspector General (OIG) called for changes to proposed Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law reforms that would create safe harbors for providers participating in value-based care models.

CMS and OIG proposed the new safe harbors late last year in...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, OIG, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Regulations, Value Based
Scientists inspired the right guardrails for nuclear energy, the internet, and DNA research. Let them do the same for AI
EHDS Series - 5: European Health Data Space Governance, Enforcement and Timelines
Mandatory Reporting Laws Meant To Protect Children Get Another Look
EU regulation: AI Act will mean a raft of new requirements for ‘high-risk’ systems
Manatt Launches Health AI Policy Tracker

Share This Article