RevCycle Intelligence January 3, 2020
Samantha McGrail

Policy alignment, financial risk threshold modification, and overall flexibility will help tackle concerns surrounding proposed Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law reform, medical groups say.

Tying Anti-Kickback and Stark Law reform to the level of financial risk providers assume creates more complexity and burden and could impede the transition to value-based care for physicians, advocacy organizations representing medical groups recently stated.

Comment letters from the American Medical Group Association (AGMA) and the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) to CMS and Office of the Inspector General (OIG) called for changes to proposed Anti-Kickback Statute and Stark Law reforms that would create safe harbors for providers participating in value-based care models.

CMS and OIG proposed the new safe harbors late last year in...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Insurance, OIG, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Regulations, Value Based
The Difference Between a Law and a Regulation in Healthcare, Post-Chevron
Google, Meta execs blast Europe over strict AI regulation as Big Tech ups the ante
The Future of Regulatory Compliance Lies in AI-Powered Tech
AI Regulations: EU Withdraws AI Liability Proposal; US Seeks Comments on AI Action Plan
Europe risks becoming a 'museum' if it doesn't innovate in AI and deregulate, Swedish PM warns

Share This Article