Surgeon's Record September 9, 2025
Ben Schwartz

In US healthcare, measuring quality consumes over 100,000 staff hours and $5 million per hospital system every year, yet we’re no closer to agreeing on what quality actually means. Everyone agrees that fixing healthcare requires putting quality at the center. The harder part is defining it, measuring it, and proving that we’ve actually improved it.

Healthcare has long chased quality through an alphabet soup of programs — MIPS, BPCI, CJR, ACOs, and now TEAM and ASM. The premise of these efforts is sound: measure what matters, pay for performance (outcomes), and hold stakeholders accountable.

Results are mixed. Savings have been modest at best, especially when accounting for reconciliation payments. Outcomes aren’t any worse than traditional care, but that’s not exactly...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Payment Models, Provider, Value Based
Reengineering ACOs To Make Medicare Competitive
Follow the money: How AI technology could fit into accountable care
Are Hospitals Procrastinating on TEAM Model Work?
The AI leadership gap threatening value-based care
Generative AI in Value-Based Care and Risk-Bearing Organizations

Share Article