Commonwealth Fund July 22, 2020
Dania Palanker, Emily Curran, Arreyellen Salyards

Toplines

Short-term health insurance plans often lack essential protections for people with preexisting conditions and typically have high out-of-pocket costs

Despite predictions that short-term health plans would evolve, a new analysis shows that they don’t protect people against high costs or offer comprehensive coverage

Short-term health plans were originally intended as a temporary lower-cost option for people who need catastrophic coverage during times of transition. Citing the need for a more affordable option in the individual marketplace, the Trump administration pushed to extend the contract terms on short-term health plans so they could be purchased as a substitute for year-long coverage. In a 2018 rule, short-term health plan coverage was lengthened from three months to just under 12 months. These...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider
Healthcare prices surge 14% in last 5 years: Report
ACR ‘deeply troubled’ by health insurer’s ‘latest attempt to undervalue the role of radiologists’
What the Medicaid unwinding means for plans, providers, and more
What Impact is AI Having on the Collection and Analysis of RWE?
WebMD Ignite launches new member engagement platform for payers

Share This Article