Lexology November 21, 2022
Bass Berry & Sims PLC

On November 14, Judge Edward Chen in the Northern District of California issued rulings on the pending motions to dismiss in U.S. ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente, granting in part and denying in part Kaiser’s motion to dismiss. United States ex rel. Osinek v. Kaiser Permanente, No. 3:13-cv-03891-EMC, Dkt. No. 223 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 25, 2022). These rulings offer insight into the evolving landscape and permissibility of legal falsity claims predicated on sub-regulatory guidelines.

Background

The United States previously intervened in six qui tam complaints alleging that Kaiser violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by submitting inaccurate diagnosis codes for its Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, resulting in higher reimbursements. Specifically, the government had alleged two different theories of liability: (1)...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Insurance, Medicare Advantage
Fewer Medicare Advantage Plans Are Offering Home-Based Care Services For 2025
Medicare Advantage and Part D Programs to Remain in the Enforcement Spotlight in 2025
Why aren't Medicare Advantage enrollees using supplemental benefits?
Alignment Healthcare names new president as insurer eyes growth
Clover, Alignment grow Medicare Advantage enrollment

Share This Article