Lexology October 9, 2019
Frost Brown Todd LLC

The 386-page notice of proposed rulemaking seeks comment on revisions of the safe harbors to the Federal Anti-Kickback Statute (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(b); “AKS”) and the Federal Civil Monetary Penalty (42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a(a)(5); “CMP”) rules regarding beneficiary inducements. It also demonstrates a focus on permitting innovative arrangements and a shift to value-based care.[1] Generally, the proposed rule seeks to add the following:

  1. new safe harbor protections to the AKS for certain coordinated care and associated value-based arrangements between or among clinicians, providers, suppliers, and others; and
  2. new protections under the AKS and CMP law that prohibit inducements offered to patients for certain patient engagement and that support arrangements to improve quality of care, health outcomes, and efficiency of...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, HHS, Insurance, OIG, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Regulations
The Difference Between a Law and a Regulation in Healthcare, Post-Chevron
Google, Meta execs blast Europe over strict AI regulation as Big Tech ups the ante
The Future of Regulatory Compliance Lies in AI-Powered Tech
AI Regulations: EU Withdraws AI Liability Proposal; US Seeks Comments on AI Action Plan
Europe risks becoming a 'museum' if it doesn't innovate in AI and deregulate, Swedish PM warns

Share This Article