STAT June 28, 2024
John Wilkerson

WASHINGTON — The U.S. response to the Covid-19 pandemic got politically messy. A Friday Supreme Court ruling could frustrate government responses to public health emergencies even further.

The Supreme Court struck down a long-standing legal doctrine that directed judges to defer to reasonable federal agency interpretations of ambiguous or technically challenging aspects of the law. The loss of the so-called Chevron doctrine calls into question every federal agency’s interpretation of a statute, so the ruling affects the regulations of all federal agencies.

However, the government’s ability to respond to public health emergencies is particularly vulnerable. When public health emergencies are declared, the government is granted broad discretion to act without first undertaking the long process of rulemaking.

During the pandemic,...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Public Health / COVID
Growing gulf in US life expectancy deepened by COVID-19 pandemic
Stick to the Science
Understanding the Growing Impact of Obesity in the United States
Wearable electrical nerve stimulation device eases long COVID pain and fatigue, say researchers
Transforming public health: a physician’s innovative approach [PODCAST]

Share This Article