Digital Journal June 24, 2024
Stacker

By Wade Zhou

In 2013, Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne, two academics at the University of Oxford, published an influential study assessing the likelihood of various jobs being automated. Based on their research, they concluded that “routine jobs” for low-wage workers were the most likely to be automated. Their analysis, based on the technology available at the time, conjured up images of factory workers being replaced by machines on assembly lines.

Over a decade later, the image of automation has changed. Modern AI systems have proven adept at generating text, computer code, images, and more, putting the jobs of graphic designers, programmers, writers, and other professionals at risk. Contrary to Frey and Osborne’s conclusion,...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Employer, Technology
Anthropic’s chief scientist on 5 ways agents will be even better in 2025
AI tool assists doctors in sharing lab results
Self-invoking code benchmarks help you decide which LLMs to use for your programming tasks
Ranked: AI Models With the Lowest Hallucination Rates
How Artificial Intelligence Is Transforming The Job Market: A Guide To Adaptation And Career Transformation

Share This Article