Digital Journal June 24, 2024
Stacker

By Wade Zhou

In 2013, Carl Benedikt Frey and Michael Osborne, two academics at the University of Oxford, published an influential study assessing the likelihood of various jobs being automated. Based on their research, they concluded that “routine jobs” for low-wage workers were the most likely to be automated. Their analysis, based on the technology available at the time, conjured up images of factory workers being replaced by machines on assembly lines.

Over a decade later, the image of automation has changed. Modern AI systems have proven adept at generating text, computer code, images, and more, putting the jobs of graphic designers, programmers, writers, and other professionals at risk. Contrary to Frey and Osborne’s conclusion,...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Employer, Technology
The 3 most promising uses for GenAI in healthcare
OpenAI’s $40 Billion And Circle IPO: AI And Blockchain’s Revolution
The Flawed Assumption Behind AI Agents’ Decision-Making
Q&A: Researcher discusses agentic AI, expected to be the next trend in digital medicine
Generative AI Is A Crisis For Copyright Law

Share This Article