Harvard Business Review November 19, 2025
David De Cremer, Shane Schweitzer, Jack J. McGuire, Devesh Narayanan

Summary.

Many AI projects fail because leaders treat adoption as a tech purchase instead of a behavioral change problem. People resist tools that disrupt routines, overreact to visible AI errors, and prefer familiar human judgment. As a result, even good systems fail to gain purchase. Leaders can address this problem by applying “Behavioral Human-Centered AI” across the AI adoption cycle. In the design phrase, companies should co-design with diverse users, add purposeful friction where it improves scrutiny, require beta tests with subgroup results and behavioral input. During adoption, they should frame AI as an augmenter, disclose limits and safeguards, use explainability to boost perceived control. During the management phase, they need to educate leadership, model use, track people-centric...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Investments, Mental Health, Provider, Technology, Trends
AI-enabled clinical data abstraction: a nurse’s perspective
Contextual AI launches Agent Composer to turn enterprise RAG into production-ready AI agents
OpenAI’s latest product lets you vibe code science
WISeR in 2026: Legal, Compliance, and AI Challenges That Could Reshape Prior Authorization for Skin Substitutes
Dario Amodei warns AI may cause ‘unusually painful’ disruption to jobs

Share Article