Lexology July 1, 2022
Mayer Brown

The United States Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., ––– U.S. –––, 2022 WL 2276808 (2022), overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). In holding that the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to abortion, the court “returned” regulating abortion to the individual states. Aside from the obvious systematic implications of the decision, Dobbs has now created various challenges for pharmaceutical retailers and their ability to comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) privacy requirements.

Key Considerations for Pharmaceutical Retailers and Beyond

HIPAA is a comprehensive federal law that created national standards to prevent certain health information...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, HHS, HIPAA, Patient / Consumer, Privacy / Security, Provider, Regulations
Addressing The HIPAA Blind Spot For Crisis Pregnancy Centers
6 Important Takeaways for HIPAA Covered Entities and Business Associates from 2024 NIST HHS OCR Conference
HHS settles 2 ransomware investigations as attacks rise
Safeguarding Health Information: Takeaways from HHS and NIST 2024 HIPAA Security Conference
White House OMB is reviewing proposed cybersecurity updates to HIPAA

Share This Article