Lexology July 1, 2022
Mayer Brown

The United States Supreme Court recently issued its decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Org., ––– U.S. –––, 2022 WL 2276808 (2022), overturning Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992). In holding that the U.S. Constitution does not protect a right to abortion, the court “returned” regulating abortion to the individual states. Aside from the obvious systematic implications of the decision, Dobbs has now created various challenges for pharmaceutical retailers and their ability to comply with Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (“HIPAA”) privacy requirements.

Key Considerations for Pharmaceutical Retailers and Beyond

HIPAA is a comprehensive federal law that created national standards to prevent certain health information...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, HHS, HIPAA, Patient / Consumer, Privacy / Security, Provider, Regulations
Selling a practice: How to remain HIPAA compliant during a sale
Why are only physicians prosecuted under HIPAA? [PODCAST]
HIPAA Enforcement Marches On (?)
New privacy screen protectors launched to help practices stay HIPAA compliant
Home-Based Care Providers Vulnerable to HIPAA Compliance Issues

Share This Article