Yahoo Finance January 19, 2020
Anjalee Khemlani, Senior Reporter

Single payer, or no single payer?

As candidates and policymakers debate health care’s future amid soaring insurance costs, a new study from the University of California San Francisco examined 22 single-payer plan proposals in the past 30 years. It found that a public-run system would save money over time.

Single-payer opponents argue it would increase both costs and inefficiency: Indeed, the UCSF study’s suggested the details would ultimately determine the savings. Yet the data found that single-payer “would save money over time, likely even during the first year of operation.”

James G. Kahn, a UCSF professor and a study’s researcher, said that “even though they start with different single designs and modeling assumptions, the vast majority of these studies all...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Market Research, Medicare, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Trends
GOP jumps on chance to bash Biden on Medicare
Does Medicare cover physical therapy? Yes, and you might be eligible for more services, too
CMMI’s Innovations in Behavioral Health: Promoting Physical and Mental Well-being
7 Tips for making the most of value-based care
Medicare Stumbles Managing a Costly Problem — Chronic Illness

Share This Article