Healthcare DIVE February 9, 2018
Meg Bryant

Dive Brief:

  • Modernizing the Medicare fee-for-service (FFS) cost-sharing design to include features of private plans, such as cost caps, could reduce some of the current uncertainty around beneficiaries’ annual cost-sharing burden, but would involve trade-offs, a new Government Accountability Office report finds.
  • GAO looked at four FFS cost-sharing designs to see how modernizing cost-sharing designs would affect beneficiaries’ costs over a period of years.
  • Among other things, the analysis showed that capping annual cost-sharing while maintaining Medicare’s aggregate share of costs would require a trade-off between the size of the cap and other cost-sharing responsibilities.

Dive Insight:

For example, in year one of a design with no deductible, 18% co-insurance and a $10,000 cap, the median annual cost-sharing...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, GAO, Medicare, Medicare Advantage, Payer
VA responds to reports of EHR glitches, ahead of renewed 2026 rollouts
Covert watchdog testing finds ACA vulnerable to subsidy fraud
Federal watchdog reports ACA fraud risk
Obamacare fraud report has Republicans crying foul
Reducing Spending And Enhancing Value In US Health Care: Reflections On The GAO Report

Share Article