Medscape March 12, 2020
Marcia Frellick

Anyone who thinks board-certified family physicians (FPs) and self-identified general practitioners (GPs) can be lumped into one broad category should think again, according to a new study.

“Lumping GPs and FPs together risks misclassification bias and threatens validity of [research] findings,” write William R. Phillips, MD, MPH, with the Department of Family Medicine at the University of Washington in Seattle, and colleagues. Their study, published online March 9 in the Annals of Family Medicine, was supported in part by the American Board of Family Medicine (ABFM) Foundation.

The report is interesting because it answers long-standing questions: “Why are GPs included as FPs, and who are they and what do they do?” said Jack Westfall, MD, MPH, director of the Robert...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Market Research, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Trends
9 key takeaways from AHA 2024 in Chicago
'Criminalized medicine' and what it means for physicians
The dire state of 'transparency' in healthcare
Number of cardiologists jumping to hospital practice doubles: Study
Amazing Technologies Changing The Future Of Dermatology - 2

Share This Article