Lexology November 29, 2023
Squire Patton Boggs

Courts around the country continue to disagree on the causation standard to be applied in False Claims Act cases based on alleged Anti-Kickback Statute violations. Two recent federal district court decisions out of the District of Massachusetts add to differing conclusions on what the causation standard should be, i.e., “but-for,” “exposure,” or some other, less demanding standard. In United States v. Regeneron Pharms., Inc., No. 20-11217-FDS, 2023 WL 7016900 (D. Mass. Oct. 25, 2023), the district court adopted the Sixth and Eighth Circuits’ “but for” causation standard. See United States ex rel. Martin v. Hathaway, 63 F.4th 1043 (6th Cir. 2023), and United States ex rel. Cairns v. D.S. Med. LLC, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022). In United States...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Provider, Regulations
10 headwinds for health systems in 2025
The Physician's Role in Curing the Social Media Epidemic
Bariatric Surgeons Being Put Out of Work by GLP-1 Drugs
The CMS NHE 2023 Report: An Incomplete Picture at a Pivotal Time
2025: Provider organizations will embrace new AI and analytics techniques

Share This Article