Lexology November 29, 2023
Squire Patton Boggs

Courts around the country continue to disagree on the causation standard to be applied in False Claims Act cases based on alleged Anti-Kickback Statute violations. Two recent federal district court decisions out of the District of Massachusetts add to differing conclusions on what the causation standard should be, i.e., “but-for,” “exposure,” or some other, less demanding standard. In United States v. Regeneron Pharms., Inc., No. 20-11217-FDS, 2023 WL 7016900 (D. Mass. Oct. 25, 2023), the district court adopted the Sixth and Eighth Circuits’ “but for” causation standard. See United States ex rel. Martin v. Hathaway, 63 F.4th 1043 (6th Cir. 2023), and United States ex rel. Cairns v. D.S. Med. LLC, 42 F.4th 828 (8th Cir. 2022). In United States...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Provider, Regulations
15 defining healthcare trends and challenges
How Insurance Claim Denials Harm Patients’ Health, Finances
Rural leadership conference day two roundup
Sounding the Alarm on the Human Cost of Medical Debt
Can AI predict the next pandemic? A new study says yes

Share This Article