Lexology November 22, 2024
Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck LLP

The evolution of the standard

Initially, in 1906, Congress had provided for no premarket review of drugs. By 1938, Congress required the premarket review of drug safety. Years later, in 1962, after thalidomide use in Europe caused severe birth defects, Congress required that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) could only approve drugs if “safe and effective” as demonstrated by “substantial evidence.” This dual standard—safe and effective and substantial evidence, coupled with FDA’s practice of reviewing and analyzing submitted data itself, without relying solely on the drug sponsor’s presentation and analysis of the data—is the FDA’s gold standard of drug review.

FDA understands “safe and effective” to mean the benefit of the drug exceeds its risks. “Substantial evidence” is defined...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies
Supporting the Development of Drugs for Rare Diseases — The Importance of Regulatory Transparency
Opinion: To fight for those with rare diseases, Trump must reform and modernize the FDA thoughtfully
5 Rare Diseases That Now Have Their First FDA-Approved Treatments
FDA’s Recent Guidance on Accelerated Approval and Implications for Rare Diseases
This Bill Could Make It Legal for AI to Prescribe Medicine

Share This Article