JAMA Network March 25, 2024
Holly Fernandez Lynch, Aaron S. Kesselheim

In its current term, the US Supreme Court will decide Food and Drug Administration (FDA) v Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (AHM), a case challenging FDA’s regulation of mifepristone, a drug involved in more than half of US abortions. Many have drawn attention to the case’s clear implications for reproductive justice, as well as its potentially destabilizing influence on the drug development and innovation ecosystem.1 It is also important, however, to understand AHM’s broader context, which is likely to influence both its outcome and its impact. We focus on 3 elements of that critical background, including an agency that sometimes struggles with the tension between scientific judgments and political considerations, deepening attacks on administrative agencies and FDA in particular, and questions...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: FDA, Govt Agencies
President-elect Trump's picks for CDC, FDA, surgeon general: 31 notes
Opinion: RFK Jr. and MAHA should champion a Marshall Plan for obesity
Trump picks Johns Hopkins surgeon to head FDA: 10 things to know
Regulatory Hurdles and Ethical Concerns Beset FDA Oversight of AI/ML Devices
Will Trump's healthcare appointments bring 'radical changes'?

Share This Article