KFF Health News January 28, 2020
MaryBeth Musumeci

The Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) future continues to be uncertain as Texas v. U.S. (known as California v. Texas in the U.S. Supreme Court), remains unresolved. This ongoing litigation challenges the ACA’s minimum essential coverage provision (known as the individual mandate) and raises questions about the entire law’s survival. The individual mandate provides that most people must maintain a minimum level of health insurance coverage; those who do not do so must pay a financial penalty (known as the shared responsibility payment) to the IRS. The individual mandate was upheld as a constitutional exercise of Congress’ taxing power by a five member majority of the Supreme Court in NFIB v. Sebelius in 2012.

In the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: ACA (Affordable Care Act), Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Insurance, Patient / Consumer, Payer, Provider, Public Exchange, Regulations
Cigna, Oscar Health to shutter small group business
Status of State Medicaid Expansion Decisions: Interactive Map - 2
New ACA Policy Expands Access To Dental Care. Now, States Need To Act
Oscar Health records first quarterly net profit, exceeds EPS expectations
Biden Team’s Tightrope: Reining In Rogue Obamacare Agents Without Slowing Enrollment

Share This Article