Computerworld February 12, 2025
Evan Schuman

The decisions announced by the EU Tuesday were directly caused by member disagreements, but indirectly reflect fears of overregulating AI.

When the EU on Tuesday said it was not, at this time, moving ahead with critical legislation involving privacy and genAI liability issues, it honestly reported that members couldn’t agree. But the reasons why they couldn’t agree get much more complicated.

The EU decisions involved two seemingly unrelated pieces of legislation: One dealing with privacy efforts, often called the cookie law, and the other dealing with AI liability.

The EU decisions are in the annexes to the Commission’s work programme for 2025, in Annex IV, items 29 and 32. For the AI liability section (“on adapting non-contractual civil liability...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Privacy / Security, Regulations, Technology
Responsible Data Use In An Age Of AI
‘Disturbing’ Outlook: Hospices’ Top Regulatory Concerns in 2025
Senate Bill 316: An Overview for North Carolina Hospitals
AI Regulations: Tech Giants and Hollywood Converge on White House AI Strategy
California State Assembly Introduces Bill Expanding Cost Target and Antitrust Rules to Cover Healthcare Industry Investment Groups

Share This Article