Computerworld February 12, 2025
Evan Schuman

The decisions announced by the EU Tuesday were directly caused by member disagreements, but indirectly reflect fears of overregulating AI.

When the EU on Tuesday said it was not, at this time, moving ahead with critical legislation involving privacy and genAI liability issues, it honestly reported that members couldn’t agree. But the reasons why they couldn’t agree get much more complicated.

The EU decisions involved two seemingly unrelated pieces of legislation: One dealing with privacy efforts, often called the cookie law, and the other dealing with AI liability.

The EU decisions are in the annexes to the Commission’s work programme for 2025, in Annex IV, items 29 and 32. For the AI liability section (“on adapting non-contractual civil liability...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: AI (Artificial Intelligence), Govt Agencies, Healthcare System, Privacy / Security, Regulations, Technology
Lack of regulations, oversight in health care IT can cause harm
This Week in Policy and Medicine – February 16, 2025
The regulations making ASC development 'risky'
California AG Explains How Laws May Apply to AI in Healthcare
AI Action Summit: Global AI Regulations Tilting Toward Growth

Share This Article