Health Affairs January 9, 2024
Sara Rosenbaum

From the moment that the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization leaked, it was evident that part of its massive legal fallout would be a major conflict between states pursuing total or near-total abortion bans and the protections afforded all Americans under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). That conflict has now arrived at the United States Supreme Court in two consolidated cases from Idaho—Moyle v United States and Idaho v United States—that squarely focus on the relationship between EMTALA and state abortion bans.

On January 5, in a startling move, the Court stayed a lower-court injunction against Idaho’s enforcement of its abortion ban against Medicare-participating hospitals, thereby allowing the ban to take full...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider, Regulations
Lee Health to launch hospital-at-home program
Overweight, Obesity to Affect 64% of Americans by 2050
GLP-1 reduced heart failure risk by 46%: 8 study takeaways
Demand for birth control, abortion pills skyrocket post-election
10 health systems grow hospital at home

Share This Article