Health Affairs January 9, 2024
Sara Rosenbaum

From the moment that the draft majority opinion in Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization leaked, it was evident that part of its massive legal fallout would be a major conflict between states pursuing total or near-total abortion bans and the protections afforded all Americans under the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA). That conflict has now arrived at the United States Supreme Court in two consolidated cases from Idaho—Moyle v United States and Idaho v United States—that squarely focus on the relationship between EMTALA and state abortion bans.

On January 5, in a startling move, the Court stayed a lower-court injunction against Idaho’s enforcement of its abortion ban against Medicare-participating hospitals, thereby allowing the ban to take full...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: Congress / White House, Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider, Regulations
The states that would be the hardest hit by Medicaid cuts
Medtronic gains FDA OK for self-adjusting DBS system for Parkinson’s
How one practice helps care for almost half of New Mexico's pregnancies with telemedicine
The Challenge Of Medicare And Medicaid Integration For Dual Eligible Individuals Under 65
Managing the next pandemic: Staggering stay-at-home orders proven to be effective

Share This Article