Advisory Board April 25, 2024

The Supreme Court on Wednesday heard arguments in Moyle v. United States, a case regarding whether the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA) requires ED doctors to provide emergency abortion care to patients, even in states with strict abortion bans.

Abortion laws are continuing to change — Here’s how to help your clinical workforce right now

Background

EMTALA was passed in 1986 to prevent hospitals from refusing emergency care to patients who couldn’t pay.

Following the overturning of Roe v. Wade in Dobbs v. Jackson, the federal government issued guidance saying EMTALA provided federal protections to providers performing abortions in emergency situations, even in states with abortion restrictions.

Soon after, the Department of Justice filed a lawsuit challenging an...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: Govt Agencies, Patient / Consumer, Provider
Hospitals could see more financial pressure from ban of non-compete agreements, Fitch Ratings says
UK sets out position on regulating AI as a medical device
10 Best states for nurses 2024
Bird flu's big question: What's driving its spread
Bird Flu Is Bad for Poultry and Dairy Cows. It’s Not a Dire Threat for Most of Us — Yet.

Share This Article