Medical Economics October 11, 2019
Bill Dacey

A “bold proposal” to reduce the documentation burden on physicians was released as part of CMS’s 2019 proposed Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (PFS). This seemed to have begun as an effort to listen to stakeholders and address the problems of out-of-date guidelines, cloning, EHR misuse, and problems that have evolved since the inception of the documentation guidelines.

However, this proposal introduces a wholly self-serving and uninvited component of a change to payment rates and methodology that no one asked for.

Payment changes?

The catchy tagline of “Patients over Paperwork” implies a quality issue caused in part by administrative overkill, but let’s not forget that these are the federal guidelines that have been enthusiastically enforced for more than 20 years by...

Today's Sponsors

LEK
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

LEK

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, HIM (Health Inf Mgmt), Insurance, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, RCM (Revenue Cycle Mgmt)
Remote patient monitoring: Is a change coming for codes?
Risk Adjustment and Incentives for Upcoding in Medicare
How AI-powered systems can help physician groups improve coding – and earn more
LLMs are not ready to automate clinical coding, says Mount Sinai study
Demystifying Coding Compliance: 3 Key Strategies for Navigating the Regulatory Waters of RCM

Share This Article