Medical Economics September 17, 2019
Todd Shryock

Value-based care has created a conundrum: pretty much everyone in healthcare likes the idea of paying for outcomes, but no one is sure how to fairly implement it.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) introduced a new world of value-based care to many physicians and was a major step away from fee-for-service. Gone was the Sustainable Growth Rate, replaced with a program that was supposed to drive costs down by reimbursing for quality patient outcomes.

“Congress had revised the Sustainable Growth Rate many times over the past 20 years, and everyone was fatigued by it,” says Larry Kocot, JD, head of KPMG’s Center for Healthcare Regulatory Insight and a former CMS official. “Physicians were...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
Got healthcare questions? Just ask Transcarent

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, MACRA, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Value Based
No More ‘Dabbling’: It’s Time to Embrace Value-Based Care
Black Book Research Unveils 2025’s Top-Rated Population Health & Value-Based Care Vendors: AI, Interoperability, and ROI Take Center Stage
Humana looks to deepen meaning of 'value-based care'
The Dark Side of AI in Medicare Advantage: When Value-Based Payment Eclipses Value-Based Care
Outpatient Mental Health Navigates Greater Value-Based Care, Quality Tracking From Payers

Share This Article