Medical Economics September 17, 2019
Todd Shryock

Value-based care has created a conundrum: pretty much everyone in healthcare likes the idea of paying for outcomes, but no one is sure how to fairly implement it.

The Medicare Access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) introduced a new world of value-based care to many physicians and was a major step away from fee-for-service. Gone was the Sustainable Growth Rate, replaced with a program that was supposed to drive costs down by reimbursing for quality patient outcomes.

“Congress had revised the Sustainable Growth Rate many times over the past 20 years, and everyone was fatigued by it,” says Larry Kocot, JD, head of KPMG’s Center for Healthcare Regulatory Insight and a former CMS official. “Physicians were...

Today's Sponsors

Venturous
ZeOmega

Today's Sponsor

Venturous

 
Topics: CMS, Govt Agencies, Health System / Hospital, Insurance, MACRA, Medicare, Payment Models, Physician, Primary care, Provider, Value Based
Reengineering ACOs To Make Medicare Competitive
Follow the money: How AI technology could fit into accountable care
Are Hospitals Procrastinating on TEAM Model Work?
The AI leadership gap threatening value-based care
Generative AI in Value-Based Care and Risk-Bearing Organizations

Share Article